Mudd vs. Robinet: The Comparison No One Dares to Make π§
Are you wondering if using a Mudd for your ablutions really makes a difference compared to using a tap? The answer will surprise you. In this comprehensive comparison based on real 2025 data, we analyze four objective criteria : water consumption, financial cost, time, and environmental impact.
Get ready to discover some figures that will change the way you view ablutions!
π Comparative Methodology
Basic Assumptions
For this comparison, we use the following data:
- π€ Profile : Practicing Muslim performing 5 ablutions per day
- π Period : Calculations over 1 day, 1 month, 1 year, 10 years
- π§ Water price : β¬4.20/mΒ³ (average for France in 2025)
- π₯ Water heating price : β¬0.15/kWh (electric)
- π Carbon footprint : 0.132 kg COβ/mΒ³ of water
Reference Scenario
We compare the Mudd to the standard tap (the most common practice):
- Tap open moderately during ablutions
- Average consumption: 6 liters per ablution
π§ CRITERION 1: Water Consumption
The Key Figure: 80% Less Water!
| Method | By Ablution | Per Day (5Γ) | Per month | Per Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prophetic Mudd | 0.75 L | 3.75 L | 112 L | 1,369 L |
| Standard Tap | 6 L | 30 L | 900 L | 10,950 L |
| DIFFERENCE | -5.25 L | -26.25 L | -788 L | -9,581 L |
π Calculation: The Mudd uses only 12.5% ββof tap water
In other words: 80% less water with the Mudd!
A 10-Year Perspective
- π§ With Mudd : 13,690 liters
- π§ With tap : 109,500 liters
- π Savings : 95,810 litres = 639 bathtubs !
π° CRITERION 2: Financial Cost
Water Cost Calculation
Average price of water in France (2025): β¬4.20/mΒ³ (water + sanitation)
| Period | Mudd | Faucet | Economy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | β¬5.75 | β¬45.99 | β¬40.24 |
| 10 Years | β¬57.50 | β¬459.90 | β¬402.40 |
| 30 Years | β¬172.50 | β¬1,379.70 | β¬1,207.20 |
Adding the Cost of Heating Water
If you use hot water for your ablutions (winter):
| Period | Mudd (water + heating) | Tap (water + heating) | Total Economy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | β¬15.20 | β¬121.59 | β¬106.39 |
| 10 Years | β¬152 | β¬1,216 | β¬1,064 |
| 30 Years | β¬456 | β¬3,648 | β¬3,192 |
King of Mudd By Madinah
Price of a Mudd By Madinah : β¬12.50
- β±οΈ Return on investment : 1.1 months
- π° Net profit over 10 years : β¬1,051.50 (β¬1,064 - β¬12.50)
- π ROI : 8,412% over 10 years!
π‘ In short : For every euro invested in a Mudd, you get back 84 euros over 10 years!
β±οΈ CRITERION 3: Time
Duration of Ablutions
| Method | Time/Ablution | Time/Day (5Γ) | Time/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mudd | 2-3 min | 12.5 min | 76 hours |
| Faucet | 4-5 min | 22.5 min | 137 hours |
| GAIN | -2 min | -10 min | -61 hours |
Time Analysis
Surprise : The Mudd is faster than the tap!
For what ?
- β No temperature setting
- β No waiting for the water to heat up
- β Precise and efficient movements
- β Concentration on the act of worship
Time saved over 10 years : 610 hours , or 25 full days !
π CRITERION 4: Environmental Impact
Water Carbon Footprint
Water production, treatment and distribution: 0.132 kg COβ/mΒ³
| Period | Mudd | Faucet | COβ Avoided |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | 0.18 kg | 1.45 kg | 1.27 kg |
| 10 Years | 1.81 kg | 14.45 kg | 12.64 kg |
Carbon Footprint of Heating
Electric water heating: 0.057 kg COβ/kWh
| Period | Mudd (total) | Tap (total) | COβ Avoided |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | 3.77 kg | 30.18 kg | 26.41 kg |
| 10 Years | 37.7 kg | 301.8 kg | 264.1 kg |
Carbon Footprint Reduction
Using the Mudd instead of the tap:
- π± Annual reduction : 26.41 kg COβ
- π± Reduction over 10 years : 264.1 kg COβ
- π± Equivalent : 1,320 km saved by car
π Collective impact : If 1 million Muslims in France used the Mudd, it would represent a reduction of 26,410 tonnes of COβ per year !
π Impact on Mosques
Case of a Mosque with 200 Worshippers
Hypothesis: 200 people perform their ablutions at the mosque every day
| Criteria | With Taps | With Mudds | Economy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water/Year | 438,000 L | 54,750 L | 383,250 L (-87%) |
| Cost/Year | β¬1,840 | β¬230 | β¬1,610 |
| COβ/Year | 1,207 kg | 151 kg | 1056 kg |
Investment : Pack of 10 Mudds Γ 2 = β¬178 (instead of β¬298 with -40%)
ROI mosque : 1.3 months !
π Final Summary Table
| Criteria | Mudd | Faucet | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water/Year | 1,369 L β | 10,950 L | -80% |
| Cost/Year | β¬15.20 β | β¬121.59 | -87% |
| Time/Year | 76 h β | 137 h | -45% |
| COβ/Year | 3.77 kg β | 30.18 kg | -87% |
| Sunnah | β 100% | β 0% | - |
π‘ Objections and Responses
"It's too complicated."
β False . After 3-4 days of practice, it becomes automatic. Our customers testify that it's even simpler than using a tap.
"I don't have time."
β False . The Mudd is faster : 2-3 min vs 4-5 min from the tap.
"It doesn't really make a difference."
β False . Over 10 years: 95,810 litres saved, β¬1,064 saved, 264 kg COβ avoided.
"It's expensive."
β False . Only β¬12.50 with a 1.1-month ROI. This is the most profitable investment you will make this year.
π Conclusion: The Numbers Speak for Themselves
This objective comparison demonstrates that the Mudd surpasses the tap on ALL criteria :
- π§ 80% less water (the Mudd uses only 12.5% ββof tap water)
- π° β¬1,064 saved over 10 years
- β±οΈ 25 days saved over 10 years
- π 264 kg COβ avoided over 10 years
- π€² 100% in accordance with the Sunnah
And all that for only β¬12.50!
The real question is no longer "Why use a Mudd?" but "Why not use it?"
May Allah make it easy for us to follow the Sunnah and reward us for our efforts in preserving His resources. Ameen π€²
Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.